Navigating foreign exchange risk and U.S. GAAP considerations
In the face of increasing foreign currency exchange rate risk, companies should adopt effective strategies to safeguard their financial health.
In today’s dynamic global market, companies are increasingly exposed to foreign exchange risk due to fluctuations in currency values. This risk can significantly impact financial performance, making it crucial for businesses to adopt effective strategies to mitigate and minimize potential losses. Among the various strategies employed, accounting considerations play a pivotal role in making sure that these strategies are not only effective but also compliant with accounting standards, particularly U.S. GAAP.
Strategies to mitigate foreign exchange risk
There are several strategies commonly used to manage foreign exchange risk, each with its unique advantages and accounting implications under U.S. GAAP. Selecting an appropriate strategy depends largely on a company’s risk tolerance, its short- and long-term financial objectives, the predictability of future foreign currency cash flows, the volume of transactions subject to exchange rate risk, and the frequency of its foreign operations.
- Forward contracts allow companies to secure an exchange rate for a designated future date, helping to mitigate uncertainty and providing protection against unfavorable currency fluctuations. This approach is particularly well-suited for firms with predictable foreign currency obligations.
- Currency futures involve buying or selling a specific currency amount at a fixed exchange rate on a future date, helping companies hedge against fluctuations and stabilize their financial planning. This strategy is ideal for companies that favor more standardized agreement terms and exchange traded instruments.
- Options contracts offer the flexibility to exchange currency at a specified rate before or by a particular expiration date, balancing risk management with potential gains. Typically, options contracts are a useful tool for downside protection, while still allowing a company to benefit if exchange rates move favorably.
- Classic hedge instruments match revenues and expenses in the same foreign currency, naturally hedging against exchange rate fluctuations and aligning financial outcomes with operational realities. This strategy is commonly used by companies with high volumes of international operations and recurring foreign currency transactions.
Key U.S. GAAP accounting standards considerations
When implementing these strategies, companies must adhere to U.S. GAAP accounting standards for proper financial reporting and compliance.
Key considerations include:
Identification of the derivative: Guidance on derivative definition
Companies must consider if the agreement qualifies as a derivative or contains any embedded derivatives features, as provided by U.S. GAAP (ASC 815). Key criteria include:
- Having an underlying asset, such as a currency exchange rate, specifying a notional amount or payment provision,
- Minimal or no initial investment, and
- Terms that require or permit net settlement, being readily settled by a means outside the contract, or resulting in the delivery of an asset that places the recipient in a position not substantially different from net settlement.
Hedge accounting (ASC 815)
To qualify for hedge accounting, companies must formally designate the hedging relationship and document, at the inception of the hedge, the hedging strategy, risk management objective, and how effectiveness will be assessed. Ongoing effectiveness assessments are required to make sure the hedge continues to offset changes in foreign currency fair value or foreign currency cash flows attributable to the hedged risk. Changes in the fair value of derivatives must be recognized in earnings unless they qualify for hedge accounting, in which case they may be deferred in other comprehensive income (OCI) and reclassified into earnings as the hedged transaction impacts earnings.
Some entities opt for economic hedges, using derivatives to manage risk without applying hedge accounting under ASC 815. These derivatives are marked to fair value each period, with changes recognized in earnings.
For private companies, relief is available under the Private Company Council (PCC) alternatives, which may allow for simplified hedge documentation and effectiveness assessments, provided certain conditions are met.
Foreign currency transactions (ASC 830)
It is important to note that different approaches apply when accounting for individual transactions denominated in a foreign currency (foreign currency measurement) versus when consolidating a foreign entity with a different functional currency (foreign currency translation):
- Foreign currency measurement: Foreign currency transactions must be translated into the functional currency – the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates – using the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies must be revalued at the current exchange rate at each reporting date, with gains and losses recognized in earnings.
- Foreign currency translation: Foreign currency financial statements must be translated into the reporting entity’s presentation currency. Assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate in effect at the reporting date, while revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates for the period. The resulting translation adjustments are not recognized in earnings but are instead reported in OCI.
Fair value measurement (ASC 820)
Companies must use appropriate valuation techniques to measure the fair value of derivatives, considering market conditions and inputs. Detailed disclosures about the fair value measurements, including the valuation techniques and inputs used, must be provided in the financial statements.
In conclusion: Understand your strategies’ accounting nuances
In the face of increasing foreign currency exchange rate risk, companies should adopt effective strategies to safeguard their financial health. While evaluating strategies, management should consult with their technical accounting team to consider the accounting implications, as each tool and agreement is nuanced. It is better to address these considerations as the documents are drafted rather than deal with complexities after the fact.
Our team is available to answer your questions on these accounting implications. Reach out to discuss your specific needs.


Risk Quantification Tariff Risk Impact Model (RQ TRIM)
Looking for the full list of our dedicated professionals here at CohnReznick?
Contact
Let’s start a conversation about your company’s strategic goals and vision for the future.
Please fill all required fields*
Please verify your information and check to see if all require fields have been filled in.
Related services
Our solutions are tailored to each client’s strategic business drivers, technologies, corporate structure, and culture.
This has been prepared for information purposes and general guidance only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and CohnReznick, its partners, employees and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it.