Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 132 excludes certain amounts of employer-provided “qualified transportation fringes” – generally, transit passes, qualified parking, and transportation in a “commuter highway vehicle” between work and home – from an employee’s taxable compensation. However, under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, effective for 2018 and after, Section 274(a)(4) denies the employer a deduction for providing employees with these fringes (unless the expenses are treated as taxable compensation to the employees who receive them, in which case they may be deductible as compensation under Section 162; or unless they are incurred as necessary for ensuring the safety of employees under Section 274(l)).
In 2018, the IRS issued Notice 2018-99 (the Notice) to provide a methodology for employers to use to determine the amount of nondeductible expenses for employer-provided employee parking until proposed regulations are issued. See our prior Insight for a detailed discussion of that methodology.
Having just ended the second calendar year in which this provision has been in effect, we wanted to remind affected employers of the non-deductibility of non-taxable employer-provided employee parking expenses, and to provide examples of calculations of nondeductible employee parking expenses under the multistep methodology provided under the Notice.
An employer owns a surface parking lot adjacent to its office and incurs $10,000 of total parking expenses. The parking lot has 500 spaces that are used by its customers and employees. There are usually 50 employees parking in unreserved parking spaces during normal working hours on a typical business day. The employer usually has approximately 300 unreserved spots that are empty during normal business hours on a typical business day.
Step 1: The employer has no parking spaces that are exclusively reserved for its employees.
Step 2: Is the parking lot used primarily for the general public?
- 50 of the employer’s employees park in 500 spaces
- 50 / 500 = 10% employee use.
- Because only 10% of the employer’s parking lot is used for employee parking, the lot is primarily used for the general public (90%). The “greater than 50%” test under the Notice is passed, and there is no need to move on to Step 3.
An employer owns a surface parking lot adjacent to its office and incurs $10,000 of total parking expenses. The parking lot has 500 spaces that are used by the employer’s customers and employees. Fifty of the employer’s officers park in the lot in reserved spaces, and an additional 150 of the employer’s employees park in unreserved spaces during normal working hours on a typical business day. The employer usually has approximately 300 unreserved spaces that are empty during normal business hours on a typical business day.
Step 1: The employer has 50 spaces that are exclusively reserved for its employees.
- 50 / 500 = 10% employee use
- 10% X $10,000 parking expenses = $1,000 of nondeductible parking expense.
Step 2: Is the remainder of the parking lot used primarily for the general public?
- 500 spaces less 50 reserved spaces = 450 remaining spaces
- 150 of the employer’s employees park in the remaining 450 spaces
- 150 / 450 = 33% employee use
- Since only 33% of the employer’s parking lot is used for employee parking, the lot is primarily used for the general public (67%). The “greater than 50%” test is passed, and there is no need to move on to Step 3.
- The total amount of nondeductible parking expense is $1,000, taken from Step 1.
*Example from IRS Notice 18-99.
What Does CohnReznick Think?
We anticipate greater detail when proposed regulations are provided. Until such time, employers should continue to work with the rules provided under the Notice, including, as applicable, the use of its multistep approach. The Notice specifies that the Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that the taxable compensation deduction exception under Section 274(e)(2) does apply to employer-provided employee parking (i.e., an employer that treats an employee’s parking expense as taxable to the employee can deduct the expense); however, the Notice does not provide any amplification regarding the Section 274(l) deduction exception for employer-provided employee commuter benefits “necessary for ensuring the safety of the employee.” We continue to await additional guidance regarding the Section 274(l) exception.
Any advice contained in this communication, including attachments and enclosures, is not intended as a thorough, in-depth analysis of specific issues. Nor is it sufficient to avoid tax-related penalties. This has been prepared for information purposes and general guidance only and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and CohnReznick LLP, its members, employees and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it.
Press ReleaseKielczewski joins CohnReznick as Tax DirectorCohnReznick LLP, one of the leading advisory, assurance, and tax firms in the United States, today announced that Laura Kielczewski has joined the firm as Director in the Exempt Organizations Tax Services practice.
InsightHow individual and business tax rates, credits, and more could change under the Biden presidencyJoe Biden has proposed or supported changes across the tax landscape. Read a summary of notable ones that could impact individuals and businesses.
InsightTreasury and IRS release final regulations on treatment of carried interestMoshe Biderman, Jonathan R. Collett, Robert Richardt, Mark PapaThe new regulations include substantial taxpayer-friendly modifications. In a newly published article for Bloomberg Tax, CohnReznick’s Moshe Biderman, Jonathan R. Collett, Robert Richardt, and Mark Papa break down the regulations.
InsightMaryland 2021 first quarter filing and payment due dates extendedJohn Iannotti, Marissa McClainRead how Maryland has changed due dates for corporate and pass-through entity income tax, sales and use tax, estimated income tax, and more due to COVID-19.
InsightTax credit available to employers that voluntarily provide FFCRA COVID-19-related paid leave during first quarter of 2021Employers that had to provide COVID-19-related paid sick and family leave in 2020 can claim a tax credit if they voluntarily do so in early 2021. Read more.
InsightSection 1031 like-kind exchange limitations: Final regulations released on ‘real property’ definitionRichard Shevak, Derek WeaverRead about key updates to how property qualifies for like-kind exchange treatment, related to state and local law, “incidental personal property,” and more.
InsightFinal 451(b) and 451(c) regulations address offsets, exceptions, and moreRichard Shevak, Travis ButlerRead clarifications from the IRS and Treasury on rules for the specified goods exception, cost offsets, and more.