Texas adopts economic nexus rule for its franchise tax
On Dec. 20, 2019, the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts (Comptroller) adopted proposed amendments to the “Nexus” section of its franchise tax regulations (34 TAC Section 3.586) establishing the ways in which a non-Texas entity can create nexus in the state notwithstanding a lack of physical presence. (The proposed changes can be found in the Texas Register’s Sept. 27 issue. They were adopted in the Dec. 20 issue. All citations herein reference the regulation as amended.)
The new economic nexus rule
The amended rules provide that a “foreign taxable entity” that does not have physical presence in Texas will have nexus in Texas and be subject to the franchise tax if it had gross receipts from business done in Texas of $500,000 or more during that federal income tax accounting period. 34 TAC Section 3.586(f) Texas gross receipts are determined using the Comptroller’s rules for calculating franchise tax apportionment. Id. “Foreign taxable entity” is defined in 34 TAC Section 3.586(b) as “a taxable entity that is not chartered or organized in Texas.”
The new economic nexus rule applies to federal income tax accounting periods ending in 2019 or later. 34 TAC Section 3.586(f)
Presumptive nexus for holders of Texas use tax permits
The amended rules also provide a rebuttable presumption of franchise tax nexus for foreign taxable entities holding Texas use tax permits, in 34 TAC Section 3.586(e).
The Comptroller asserts that the change is consistent with existing practice. As such, this rule applies to franchise tax reports originally due on or after Jan. 1, 2008. 34 TAC Section 3.586(a)
Other changes
The amended rules clarify in 34 TAC Section 3.586(c) that “nexus is determined on an individual taxable entity level.”
They also provide the following criteria for determining when a foreign taxable entity begins doing business in Texas:
“(g) Beginning date. A foreign taxable entity begins doing business in the state on the earliest of:
1) the date the entity has physical nexus as described in subsection (c) of [34 TAC Section 3.586] (CohnReznick note: This should probably read “as described in subsection (d)” based on the amended regulations.);
(2) the date the entity obtains a Texas use tax permit; or
(3) the first day of the federal income tax accounting period in which the entity had gross receipts from business done in Texas in excess of $500,000.”
What does CohnReznick think?
Texas requires unitary business groups to file combined returns. A taxpayer filing in Texas as a result of the new regulations will need to review the state’s combined reporting rules to determine whether any affiliates need to be included in a combined report. As a reminder, the $500,000 gross receipts test is determined on an individual taxpayer entity level (i.e., group members do not combine receipts for purposes of determining economic nexus).
Corey L. Rosenthal, JD, Principal, Practice Leader, State and Local Tax Services
646.625.5729
Coral Bernier, Director, National Tax – State and Local Tax Services
959.200.7155
Related Services
Any advice contained in this communication, including attachments and enclosures, is not intended as a thorough, in-depth analysis of specific issues. Nor is it sufficient to avoid tax-related penalties. This has been prepared for information purposes and general guidance only and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and CohnReznick LLP, its members, employees and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it.
-
InsightMassachusetts rules on taxing capital gains of out-of-state corporationCindy Galamgam, Marissa McClainThe Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts ruled that the Massachusetts Department of Revenue Commissioner did not have the statutory right to tax the capital gain. Read more.
-
InsightConnecticut bill provides $600 million in tax cutsCindy Galamgam, Marissa McClainA recently passed bill in Connecticut could provide $600 million in tax cuts. We detail what this means for taxpayers. Learn more.
-
InsightVirginia creates new pass-through entity taxJohn Iannotti, Marissa McClainQualifying PTEs and S Corps can now pay state income tax at the entity level on behalf of individual owners. Read more, plus how credits have changed.
-
InsightNew York's 2022-2023 Fiscal Year Budget includes pass-through entity tax changes, new tax creditsCorey L. Rosenthal; Peter Rabinowitz; Arvinder KaurRead updates related to NYS and NYC pass-through entity (PTE) taxes, individual income tax rates, new and extended tax credits, and more.