Texas adopts economic nexus rule for its franchise tax
On Dec. 20, 2019, the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts (Comptroller) adopted proposed amendments to the “Nexus” section of its franchise tax regulations (34 TAC Section 3.586) establishing the ways in which a non-Texas entity can create nexus in the state notwithstanding a lack of physical presence. (The proposed changes can be found in the Texas Register’s Sept. 27 issue. They were adopted in the Dec. 20 issue. All citations herein reference the regulation as amended.)
The new economic nexus rule
The amended rules provide that a “foreign taxable entity” that does not have physical presence in Texas will have nexus in Texas and be subject to the franchise tax if it had gross receipts from business done in Texas of $500,000 or more during that federal income tax accounting period. 34 TAC Section 3.586(f) Texas gross receipts are determined using the Comptroller’s rules for calculating franchise tax apportionment. Id. “Foreign taxable entity” is defined in 34 TAC Section 3.586(b) as “a taxable entity that is not chartered or organized in Texas.”
The new economic nexus rule applies to federal income tax accounting periods ending in 2019 or later. 34 TAC Section 3.586(f)
Presumptive nexus for holders of Texas use tax permits
The amended rules also provide a rebuttable presumption of franchise tax nexus for foreign taxable entities holding Texas use tax permits, in 34 TAC Section 3.586(e).
The Comptroller asserts that the change is consistent with existing practice. As such, this rule applies to franchise tax reports originally due on or after Jan. 1, 2008. 34 TAC Section 3.586(a)
The amended rules clarify in 34 TAC Section 3.586(c) that “nexus is determined on an individual taxable entity level.”
They also provide the following criteria for determining when a foreign taxable entity begins doing business in Texas:
“(g) Beginning date. A foreign taxable entity begins doing business in the state on the earliest of:
1) the date the entity has physical nexus as described in subsection (c) of [34 TAC Section 3.586] (CohnReznick note: This should probably read “as described in subsection (d)” based on the amended regulations.);
(2) the date the entity obtains a Texas use tax permit; or
(3) the first day of the federal income tax accounting period in which the entity had gross receipts from business done in Texas in excess of $500,000.”
What does CohnReznick think?
Texas requires unitary business groups to file combined returns. A taxpayer filing in Texas as a result of the new regulations will need to review the state’s combined reporting rules to determine whether any affiliates need to be included in a combined report. As a reminder, the $500,000 gross receipts test is determined on an individual taxpayer entity level (i.e., group members do not combine receipts for purposes of determining economic nexus).
Any advice contained in this communication, including attachments and enclosures, is not intended as a thorough, in-depth analysis of specific issues. Nor is it sufficient to avoid tax-related penalties. This has been prepared for information purposes and general guidance only and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and CohnReznick LLP, its members, employees and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it.
InsightApply early for California’s new Small Business Hiring Tax CreditKrista Schipp, John On, Mariam MemonIn the wake of COVID-19, California is offering qualifying small businesses a credit of $1,000 for each net increase in qualified employees. Learn more.
InsightIRS plans proposed regulations to allow pass-through entity SALT cap workaroundJohn Iannotti, Myron VansickelPlanned proposed regulations would let S corporations and partnerships deduct state and local income taxes in calculating their taxable income or loss. Read more.
InsightD.C. legislation affects taxation on Opportunity Zone gains, potentially reducing internal rates of returnJohn Iannotti, Steve FriedmanA law change subjects gains on Opportunity Zone investments to the District’s unincorporated business tax, potentially lowering rates of return. Read more.
InsightWayfair decision having an impact on consumer and retail M&A: Watch for unforeseen sales tax liabilitiesStephen Wyss, Harry Golematis, Scott Smith, Krista SchippThe holding changed the nexus rules for imposing sales tax on out-of-state businesses, which may impact direct-to-consumer businesses’ liabilities. Read more.