Our solutions are tailored to each client’s strategic business drivers, technologies, corporate structure, and culture.
Designing effective executive incentive compensation plans
Explore how well-structured executive compensation plans can attract, retain, and motivate top leadership while aligning performance with shareholder value.
Executive incentive compensation plans help attract, retain, and motivate top leadership. When thoughtfully structured, these plans align executive performance with shareholder value creation, offering executives an enticing mix of short-term rewards and long-term wealth-building opportunities.
Balancing cash and equity incentives
Well-designed compensation strategies balance cash and equity-based components to foster a sense of ownership in executives. Equity-based awards, often tax-deferred until a liquidity event, enable executives to build wealth while focusing on long-term company performance. For business owners, this structure promotes retention, drives strategic goals, and preserves liquidity for reinvestment.
Types of incentive plans
Organizations can motivate and retain top executive talent through a variety of incentive plans, each designed to align leadership performance with strategic business objectives. Options include:
Cash-based plans
These plans reward executives with future cash payouts contingent on achieving key performance indicators (KPIs) such as revenue growth and/or EBITDA. By focusing on short- to medium-term goals, these plans support retention and performance alignment.
Equity-based plans
These include restricted stock units (RSUs), stock options, and phantom equity. Vesting is usually tied to service periods or performance milestones. In private companies, equity awards are often linked to future liquidity events (e.g., IPO or sale), offering significant upside potential.
Strategic considerations
Strategic compensation planning requires adapting incentive structures to the company’s stage of growth, market conditions, and evolving business objectives.
- Startups may struggle to offer meaningful equity due to uncertain valuations. As they mature, equity becomes a more effective tool for motivation and retention.
- Mature companies may find legacy plans misaligned with current performance, leading to diminished value and retention challenges.
- Change-of-control events (e.g., acquisitions or IPOs) can trigger unintended payouts or executive departures, impacting valuation and requiring retention strategies.
- Distressed companies must design plans that incentivize turnaround efforts while protecting creditor interests.
Accounting implications
Properly accounting for incentive plans helps ensure transparency, compliance, and accuracy in financial reporting. Considerations include:
Cash awards
Must be accrued as liabilities over the vesting period at fair value. If tied to performance conditions (e.g., EBITDA targets), accruals depend on the probability of achievement.
Equity awards
Require fair value measurement at grant date and expense recognition over the vesting period. Depending on whether the equity award is classified as permanent equity or a liability, revaluation of the award over the vesting period may be required. Complex plans may necessitate valuation specialists and technical accounting expertise to facilitate compliance with US GAAP.
Equity vs. liability classification
The classification of awards hinges on settlement terms such as:
- Equity classification is appropriate if there is no contractual requirement to deliver cash and the company expects to settle in shares.
- Liability classification is required if cash settlement is probable or if the company cannot deliver shares.
Plans with features such as cash redemption rights or settlement in affiliate equity often trigger liability treatment and mark-to-market accounting.
Illustrative plan structures and accounting treatments
Plan type | Accounting treatment |
Cash payout on EBITDA | Accrue estimated payout over vesting period; adjust based on performance probability |
Deferred cash payout | Same as above; post-vesting payout treated as debt |
Stock options with no liquidity | Fair value at grant; expense over vesting period |
Options with cash redemption | Liability classification; mark-to-market each period |
RSUs with performance-based vesting | Fair value at grant; expense over vesting period |
RSUs converted to debt settled in affiliate equity | Liability classification; treated as stock-settled debt |
Key questions for plan design
Effective incentive plan design begins by addressing several fundamental questions about award structure, eligibility, and future contingencies.
- What is the awards’ term and vesting schedule?
- Are the awards subject to continued service requirements?
- Will settlement occur in cash, equity, or a combination?
- Are the awards transferable or contingent on future events?
- How will changes in company structure or ownership affect plan terms?
Final thoughts
Effective executive compensation plans must be carefully tailored to align leadership incentives with company goals while navigating complex accounting and tax considerations. Early consultation with legal, tax, and accounting experts helps ensure that plans are both effective and compliant, minimizing surprises and maximizing strategic impact.
Contact
Let’s start a conversation about your company’s strategic goals and vision for the future.
Please fill all required fields*
Please verify your information and check to see if all require fields have been filled in.
Related services
Any advice contained in this communication, including attachments and enclosures, is not intended as a thorough, in-depth analysis of specific issues. Nor is it sufficient to avoid tax-related penalties. This has been prepared for information purposes and general guidance only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice specific to, among other things, your individual facts, circumstances and jurisdiction. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and CohnReznick, its partners, employees and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it.