Deal optimization: Turning your operating history into better deals
Turn operating history into stronger underwriting and investment decisions with data-driven insights. Read more.
Many organizations treat each project finance transaction as a standalone exercise; Underwriting assumptions are developed, a deal is executed, and attention shifts to the next opportunity. However, every completed project contains valuable operating history that can be leveraged to improve future investment decisions.
These completed projects generate actual performance data across generation, operating expenses, development timelines, construction schedules, financing costs, production performance, and numerous other metrics. Comparing actual performance against original underwriting assumptions helps organizations identify recurring variances, improve forecasting accuracy, and strengthen future investment decisions.
For example, a portfolio may show that permitting consistently takes 20% longer than expected, operating expenses average 8% above budget, or commercial operation dates are routinely delayed by several months. Capturing both actual performance and creating meaningful views for the variance from forecasts provides a powerful foundation for better decision-making, more realistic planning, and better decisions on future investments.
Portfolio-wide insights
A data warehouse serves as the central foundation for aggregating and analyzing these historical outcomes across a portfolio. Rather than relying on anecdotal experience or isolated project reviews, organizations can create and benefit from this centralized repository of historical performance data.
To generate meaningful insights, these data points must be captured through standardized processes and governed by consistent definitions and measurement methodologies. When captured properly, development durations, construction costs, operating metrics, financing terms, investor returns, and key project milestones can all be analyzed across multiple projects, markets, technologies, and counterparties.
This allows investment teams to identify trends, benchmark performance, and quantify risks using actual historical results rather than assumptions developed in isolation. Using this captured data, teams can also segment data by technology, geography, market, or counterparty to uncover patterns that might otherwise go unnoticed.
Creating a feedback loop
The result is a continuous feedback loop that improves understanding of portfolio performance and eventually drives value creation. Historical project data directly informs underwriting assumptions, sensitivity analyses, risk assessments, and transaction structuring. As additional projects move from underwriting into operations, their results flow back into the data warehouse, expanding the dataset and improving future analyses.
Over time, each completed project adds to the historical dataset, providing greater visibility into trends, assumptions, and outcomes across the portfolio. Organizations that systematically turn historical experience into actionable intelligence can gain a meaningful competitive advantage through more accurate underwriting, better transaction structuring, reduced execution risk, and stronger investment decisions.
Capturing and learning from historical performance requires more than data alone. Organizations also need disciplined modeling practices and transparent data management to ensure that the data remains trustworthy, repeatable, and actionable.
Modeling best practice: Separation of model elements
Rule: Organize models so inputs, calculations, and outputs are clearly separated into dedicated sections or tabs. Label, group, and color worksheets based on the function they serve.
Why it matters: This separation forms the foundation of an understandable model, assumptions drive logic, logic drives outputs, and errors are isolated. Eliminating hardcodes in calculations and relying on inputs improves transparency, reduces the risk of errors, simplifies reviews, and makes models easier to maintain as business requirements evolve. Separating summary and dashboard tabs let stakeholders focus on the metrics that matter most, while still allowing a drill down into supporting logic when deeper analysis is needed.
Hardcoded values hide assumptions and make errors difficult to detect. Elaborate, nested formulas often break under alternative scenarios. When these practices slip, the common results are hidden assumptions, key-person dependency, performance lag as complexity grows, and errors that surface late in the decision-making process.
Data best practice: Data lineage
Rule: Maintain visibility into where data originates, how it is transformed, and how it flows through systems and reports. Track how key metrics and model outputs change over time. Proper data aggregation permits visibility into data lineage.
Why it matters: This approach builds trust in reporting, supports auditability, simplifies troubleshooting, and helps teams understand changes over time. Change logs help track variances in returns, create bridges between versions shared with third parties, and catch potential errors early.
How Catalyst makes it possible
Catalyst helps organizations improve these initiatives by creating a centralized environment where models, data, and reporting work together to support better decision-making.
-
- Historical project data: Capture actual project performance alongside underwriting assumptions to analyze variances, identify trends, and continuously refine future forecasts and investment decisions.
- Model governance: Organized storage of every version of your models and supporting data points, creates a transparent audit trail that makes it easier to understand how assumptions, forecasts, and results evolve over time.
- Data lineage: Connect data directly from source systems into a centralized platform while maintaining visibility into where it originated, how it was transformed, and where it is ultimately consumed. This creates a trusted foundation that can be leveraged consistently across financial models, dashboards, reports, and analytics.
Rather than building the underlying data infrastructure from scratch, Catalyst provides a purpose-built foundation that allows organizations to implement these capabilities quickly and at scale.
Related services
Our solutions are tailored to each client’s strategic business drivers, technologies, corporate structure, and culture.
Any advice contained in this communication, including attachments and enclosures, is not intended as a thorough, in-depth analysis of specific issues. Nor is it sufficient to avoid tax-related penalties. This has been prepared for information purposes and general guidance only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice specific to, among other things, your individual facts, circumstances and jurisdiction. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and CohnReznick, its partners, employees and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it.