The next phase of AI adoption in restaurants is taking shape inside the operating model. By connecting AI to financial and operational data, operators can quickly evaluate performance, surface underlying drivers, and turn information into actionable strategies and measurable results. For example, instead of reviewing a food cost variance report and then asking analysts to investigate, an operator can use AI to understand why food costs rose at a specific location, identify the menu categories driving the change, compare performance against similar units, and immediately explore corrective actions. 

Connected to the operating context behind the data, AI can change the role of reporting. Managers can question the numbers, follow anomalies into underlying drivers, and carry the analysis into planning and execution. This shifts reporting from a retrospective review into a decision-support capability. AI helps operators move from identifying what changed to understanding why it changed, what action to take, and how those actions may affect unit-level performance.  Making that model repeatable requires leaders who understand the technology, a data foundation that can support more sophisticated applications, and clear accountability for how AI-generated work is reviewed and used. Those capabilities determine how deeply AI can become part of everyday restaurant operations. 

Build AI understanding from the top 

Leaders who develop firsthand experience with AI are better positioned to determine where it belongs in the business. Using the technology themselves provides a clearer view of what it does well, where it falls short, and which business challenges it is best suited to address. 

Leaders can also identify the people most likely to move adoption forward. A “coalition of the willing” brings together employees who are curious enough to experiment, test AI against real work, and share what they learn. Their experience can help the organization build practical knowledge before committing resources to broader applications. 

Over time, that hands-on experience creates a stronger foundation for investment decisions. Leaders gain a clearer understanding of which applications solve real business problems, what capabilities are needed to support them, and which initiatives have earned the opportunity to scale. 

Implement the data foundation to scale AI 

Scaling beyond isolated applications depends on whether AI can consistently access the information needed to answer operational questions. A shared data foundation can connect information from existing systems, so users can query the business across functions, systems, and locations without rebuilding the analysis each time. 

One emerging model is a centralized data foundation that integrates information from existing restaurant systems and allows AI tools to query it. With that structure in place, operators can investigate unit-level performance, trace issues into the underlying data, and use what they learn to inform planning and make decisions. 

As the questions become more sophisticated, the quality and structure of the underlying data matter more. Operators need to consider: 

• Integration: Can information from existing systems be brought together in a usable form? 

• Data quality and ownership: Is the information reliable, and are responsibilities for managing it clear? 

• Security and compliance: How should sensitive information be accessed and protected, particularly when customer or loyalty data is involved? 

• Technical expertise: Does the organization have people who understand how the data is structured and stored well enough to support more advanced applications? 

Without a connected data environment, AI often produces fragmented answers that force managers back into manual analysis. Connecting AI more deeply to the business may require specialized expertise in enterprise data platforms, system integration, modern data architecture, and security controls. Investing at that stage can give operators a stronger foundation for expanding proven applications without rebuilding the underlying architecture each time. 

 Focus AI on defined operating problems 

Some of the most useful AI applications begin with questions restaurant teams are already trying to answer. Financial and operating data can provide an especially productive starting point because AI allows operators to evaluate that information from multiple perspectives and follow an issue deeper into the business. 

Examples include: 

• Investigating margin pressure. Operators can ask why profitability declined at a specific location and quickly identify whether food costs, labor expenses, change in traffic, menu mix, or another factor is responsible. 

• Understanding food cost variances. The leadership team can explore why food costs increased at a particular unit, determine which items are contributing most to the change, and compare results against similar locations. 

• Improving labor decisions. AI can help identify unusual labor variances, compare staffing patterns across locations, and highlight opportunities to align schedules more closely with demand. 

• Connecting demand forecasts to production. Reservation data, historical sales patterns, weather forecasts, and local events can help inform production planning and generate more accurate prep recommendations. 

• Evaluating unit performance. Many restaurant operators already hold weekly financial review meetings to discuss results and outliers. AI can provide those answers in advance by combining store-level financial results with operating, labor, menu, pricing, traffic, inventory, and local market data to show why certain locations outperform others. Leaders can then focus on actions to replicate successful practices across lower-performing units. 

 These applications create value when analysis leads to a clear decision or action. That connection provides a practical standard for evaluating AI investments: whether the application answers a meaningful business question, delivers information employees can use to make better decisions, and produces enough operational value to justify broader adoption. 

Keep humans in the driver’s seat 

As AI agents take on larger portions of existing workflows, employees may spend less time producing every element of the work themselves and more time directing, reviewing, and executing what AI produces. Operators are beginning to think of these tools almost as additional managers or employees that can perform defined parts of a job, with people retaining responsibility for supervising the work. 

Human review can be built directly into those workflows. An AI agent might identify unusual labor variances, suggest staffing adjustments, or generate a production plan, while managers review the recommendations before acting. 

Effective supervision also requires employees to understand where the technology can fall short. AI can deliver a response with considerable confidence even when the underlying answer is incomplete or incorrect. Curiosity needs to be paired with enough skepticism and experience to question an output, probe further when necessary, and recognize when human expertise should carry the decision. 

The management implication is significant: oversight becomes part of job design. Operators need clear ownership for AI-generated work, defined review and approval points, and explicit boundaries around decisions that remain human. 

Turn AI productivity into operating capacity 

AI productivity becomes meaningful when saved time creates capacity elsewhere in the operation. AI can give servers, chefs, and managers easier access to the information they need while reducing the effort required to assemble, analyze, and interpret it and give them back time to effectively do their core job responsibilities. 

That capacity can compound as AI connects decisions across the business. Demand signals can inform production requirements, purchasing, and eventually upstream supply chain decisions. Voice, ordering, reservation, and franchise applications can extend the same access to information into other parts of the restaurant system. 

The operating question is where the additional capacity gets redeployed. As AI absorbs more routine analysis and information gathering, managers can spend more time leading teams, solve problems, and serving and interacting with guests, all of which can improve employee satisfaction and  retention. In a hospitality business, the return on AI is partly measured in what the technology gives back to the people running the operation: better information, stronger decisions, and more time for work that depends on human presence and judgment. 

Any advice contained in this communication, including attachments and enclosures, is not intended as a thorough, in-depth analysis of specific issues. Nor is it sufficient to avoid tax-related penalties. This has been prepared for information purposes and general guidance only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice specific to, among other things, your individual facts, circumstances and jurisdiction. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and CohnReznick, its partners, employees and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it.