Treasury finalizes real estate safe harbor for qualified business income deduction
Rental real estate enterprise
To determine if the safe harbor is satisfied, the revenue procedure applies a test (described below) on a “rental real estate enterprise” basis. For this safe harbor, a rental real estate enterprise is an interest in real property held for the production of rents. This interest may be in a single property or multiple properties but must be held by the taxpayer or relevant passthrough entity (RPE) directly or through a disregarded entity.
Taxpayers or RPEs with multiple property interests may, but are not required to, treat similar properties as a single enterprise for Section 199A purposes. Properties are similar if they are part of the same category. For example, commercial property may only be included in the same enterprise with other commercial property, and residential property may only be included in the same enterprise with other residential property.
If a taxpayer or RPE treats similar properties as a single enterprise under this safe harbor, it must continue to do so for all similar property, including newly acquired property, provided the taxpayer relies on this safe harbor. However, if a taxpayer or RPE treats its property interests as separate rental real estate enterprises, it may opt to treat its interests in similar properties as a single enterprise in a future year.
Mixed-use property is a single building that combines residential and commercial units. It may be treated as a single rental real estate enterprise (which cannot be combined as similar property), or it may be bifurcated into separate residential and commercial interests, and each bifurcated interest may then be treated as similar property in accordance with the guidance provided in the previous paragraph.
The rental real estate enterprise test: Safe harbor requirements
A rental real estate enterprise may be treated as a trade or business for purposes of Section 199A by satisfying all of the following four requirements:
- Maintain separate books and records that reflect income and expenses for each rental real estate enterprise. If a rental real estate enterprise includes more than one property, this requirement may be satisfied if income and expense information statements for each property are maintained and then consolidated.
- Satisfy the 250-hour requirement
o Taxpayers in existence for less than four years: Taxpayers need at least 250 hours of “rental services” (explained below) performed per year related to the enterprise.
o Taxpayers in existence for more than four years: Taxpayers need at least 250 hours of rental services performed per year related to the enterprise in any three of the five consecutive tax years ending with the current taxable year.
- Maintain contemporaneous records of hours of service, descriptions of the service, dates of service, and identification of those who performed the service.
- Attach a statement to an originally filed return for each tax year relying on this safe harbor. The statement must include 1) a description of all properties in each rental real estate enterprise, 2) a description of all properties acquired or disposed of during the taxable year, and 3) a representation that the requirements of this revenue procedure are met.
Note: Descriptions of all properties should include the address and rental category (residential or commercial).
Rental services for the 250-hour requirement
Rental services include:
- advertisements to rent or lease real estate,
- negotiation and execution of leases,
- verification of information in prospective tenant applications,
- rent collection,
- daily maintenance, operation, and repair,
- management of real estate, and
- supervision of employees and independent contractors.
These services may be performed by owners, agents of the owners, or employees. Services do not include financial or investment management activities.
Types of property not eligible for this safe harbor
Properties that may not be included in a rental real estate enterprise and are therefore ineligible for this safe harbor are 1) real estate used by the taxpayer as a residence, 2) real estate rented or leased under a triple net lease, 3) real estate rented to a trade or business conducted by a taxpayer or RPE commonly controlled under IRC Section 1.199A-4(b)(1)(i), or 4) the entire rental real estate interest if any portion of the interest is treated as an SSTB.
Any advice contained in this communication, including attachments and enclosures, is not intended as a thorough, in-depth analysis of specific issues. Nor is it sufficient to avoid tax-related penalties. This has been prepared for information purposes and general guidance only and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and CohnReznick LLP, its members, employees and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it.
InsightNew regulations proposed for post-2019 income tax withholding, with guidance for new W-4Dana FriedEffective for 2020, there are new proposed regulations for income tax withholding on employee wages, including a new W-4. Here’s what to know.
InsightNew Jersey enacts elective pass-through entity tax as workaround to federal SALT capHarry Golematis, Corey RosenthalNew Jersey is offering relief to taxpayers affected by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act’s $10,000 cap on state and local tax deductions. Click to learn more.
InsightA reminder regarding nondeductible employer-provided employee parking expensesDana FriedHow should a business calculate its amount of nondeductible expenses for employer-provided employee parking? Brush up on current guidance on IRC Sec. 274(a)(4).
InsightIRS issues proposed regulations on TCJA changes to Section 162(m) $1M compensation deduction limitDana FriedHere’s what to know about definition of “covered employee”; “publicly held corporation” or “predecessor corporation” status; and more related to the expansion of IRC Sec. 162(m).