The CASB revised “the exemption from CAS for firm-fixed-price (FFP) contracts and subcontracts awarded based on adequate price competition without submission of cost or pricing data.”2 It realigns the exemption to match Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) by adding the word “certified” in front of the phrase “cost or pricing data,” under 48 CFR 9903.201-1(b) (15), which coincides with the Board’s original intent. Confusion came from contractors interpreting it to “mean cost or pricing data without the certification.”3 Therefore, the revision narrows the exemption to contracts requiring certification. Although this is a relatively small change in the language, the implications should not be underestimated.
Out of the 10 exemptions, this one is highly recognized and cherished by practitioners and government contractors in avoiding the rigors of the standards. Government contractors who seek large contracts greater than $7.5 million know the administrative value of these exceptions, and the value from avoiding potential penalties if found noncompliant. Exemptions provide companies the opportunity to seek large contracts without formerly disclosing its cost accounting practices to the government. Contractors who are awarded contracts over $50 million are required to complete an eight-part government standard form (i.e., CASB DS-1) describing how it measures, assigns and allocates direct and indirect costs to government contracts. Completing this form takes a tremendous amount of effort across all aspects of the business.
Given the current pressures from U.S. Congress and the industry to further clarify and codify, we hope to see more meetings and further pronouncements. The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2017 and 2018 both set forth strong language calling the CASB to action. The NDAA 2017, requires CASB to align its standards with generally accepted accounting principles and consider any standards under ligation to improve clarity. There is more to come as the government digests the 809 Panel’s Report of the Advisory Panel on Streamlining and Codifying Acquisition Regulations that was released on January, 2018.4
Businesses that operate or want to operate in Government procurement arena need to keep their eyes on the ever-evolving regulatory shifts that will impact how they do business. Preparing disclosure statements often takes several months of careful preparation. Mitigating risk like submitting inaccurate incomplete information, delaying or even denied potential awards, or noncompliant accounting practices deserve special attention. Our team of experienced professionals work closely with contractors to gather, assess and describe its cost accounting practices.
For over 40 years, CohnReznick has provided comprehensive services to assist government contractors with a full life cycle approach to winning and managing contracts. We ensure your financial and procurement processes are compliant, efficient and effective - so you can focus on what matters most, profitable growth.
2 83 FR 8634, Feb 28, 2018. Cost Accounting Standards: Clarification of the Exemption From Cost Accounting Standards for Firm-Fixed-Price Contracts and Subcontracts Awarded Without Submission of Certified Cost or Pricing Data.
4 The 18-person panel, created in section 809 of the FY 2016 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and amended by section 863(d) of the NDAA for FY 2017 and sections 803(c) & 883 of the NDAA for Fiscal Year 2018, is tasked with finding ways to streamline and improve the defense acquisition process.
InsightAvoiding common incurred cost proposal (ICP) submission inadequaciesGovernment contractors operating on a December 31, 2020 fiscal year end (FYE) need to complete and submit FY 2020 ICPs in accordance with the six month post-FYE deadline in FAR Clause 52.216-7, Allowable Cost and Payment.
InsightBusiness of Construction – March 2021CohnReznick will be featuring several topics important to the construction industry in a series of listen-in-style conversations, webinars, best-practice insights, and other helpful tools.
InsightEmerging risk area for government contractors: Labor category job qualifications in time and materials contractsJeffrey WittGovCons may face false claims assertions if an audit finds inadequate support for labor category qualifications in T&M billings. Learn more.
InsightContribute to the 2021 GAUGE surveyCohnReznick and Unanet invite you to take part in our fifth annual benchmarking survey for government contractors and other organizations that do business with the federal government.
InsightBusiness of Construction – February 2021CohnReznick will be featuring several topics important to the construction industry in a series of listen-in-style conversations, webinars, best-practice insights, and other helpful tools.