Proposed regulations released on 162(f) rules on deductibility and reporting of certain fines and penalties
The Treasury Department recently issued proposed regulations under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) sections 162(f) and 6050X to provide guidance on the deductibility and reporting of certain amounts paid to governments, or at their direction, relating to the violation of a law, or investigation or inquiries into the potential violation of a law.
Section 162(f) – originally enacted in 1969 – prevents taxpayers from deducting most fines and penalties. The Tax Cut and Jobs Act (TCJA) amended Section 162(f) to provide clarity around the application of the rule. TCJA provided certain exceptions to the general rule and created new code Section 6050X, which imposes reporting requirements on governmental entities that have imposed fines or penalties.
As amended by TCJA, Section 162(f)(1) provides that no deduction shall be allowed “for any amount paid or incurred (whether by suit, agreement, or otherwise) to, or at the direction of, a government, governmental entity, or nongovernmental entity in relation to the violation of a law or the investigation or inquiry by such government or governmental entity into the potential violation of a law.” The statute provides an exception for amounts if: (1) the amounts are identified (in an order or agreement) as restitution, remediation, or paid or incurred to come into compliance with the law, and (2) the taxpayer establishes that the amount was paid or incurred for one of those purposes.
The proposed regulations were issued to provide “operational and definitional guidance” in connection with the changes made by the TCJA.
Included in the proposed regulations are guidance on the deductibility exceptions in Section 162(f) and rules for complying with the reporting requirements under Section 6050X (“Information With Respect to Certain Fines, Penalties and Other Amounts”).
Proposed regulations are not generally effective until finalized and published in the Federal Register. However, the Prop. Reg. Section 1.162-21 may be relied upon currently until final regulations are published.
After restating the general rule and exception noted above, the proposed regulations under Section 162(f) address the following issues:
1. The definitions of government, governmental entity, or nongovernmental entity treated as a governmental entity.
2. Definitions of restitution and remediation for purposes of the exception under Section 162(f)(2).
3. Clarification of which amounts will be treated as amounts paid or incurred to come into compliance with a law under Section 162(f)(2).
4. Clarification of when a cost is incurred as part of an investigation or inquiry into a potential violation of law.
5. When a change to an order or agreement will be a “material change” creating a new agreement that might subject the order or agreement to the post-TCJA version of Section 162(f).
6. Rules related to a taxpayer’s obligation to “establish” that an amount paid was restitution, remediation, or paid or incurred to come into compliance with the law.
7. Rules related to the requirement that an order or agreement “identifies” the purpose of the payment.
8. Rules related to suits between private parties.
9. Rules related to taxes, tax penalties, and related interest.
Any advice contained in this communication, including attachments and enclosures, is not intended as a thorough, in-depth analysis of specific issues. Nor is it sufficient to avoid tax-related penalties. This has been prepared for information purposes and general guidance only and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice specific to, among other things, your individual facts, circumstances and jurisdiction. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and CohnReznick LLP, its partners, employees and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it.
InsightRethinking tax accounting methods: 4 key change typesRichard Shevak, Travis Butler, Tim MorrisonOptimizing your company’s tax accounting methods can help you avoid IRS risk or defer tax payments. Read about 4 top change types and their benefits.
InsightBefore you file an estate tax return, here’s what to consider to maximize proceedsDonald NimeyIn some cases where assets’ value declines after the date of death, it may be possible to maximize proceeds with an alternative date. Learn more.
InsightForm 1099 filing for 2022 tax yearJimit Mehta, Susan CooperAs you prepare for the 1099 filing season, note the changes effective for the 2022 tax year as well as important information and deadlines in this alert.
InsightGuidance at last – IRS releases Section 174 accounting method guidanceRevenue Procedure 2023-8 provides procedures to change methods of accounting for specified research or experimental expenditures. Read more.