Penalty Relief for Missing Negative Tax Basis Capital Account Information
The Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued Notice 2019-20, which provides penalty relief for partnerships unable to timely report negative tax basis capital account information, so long as certain conditions are met. Partner capital on Schedule K-1 is reported in Item L and may be reported using tax basis, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Section 704(b) book or some other method. The 2018 Instructions for Form 1065 (pg. 30) require partnerships that have partners with negative tax basis capital accounts to report those amounts on line 20 of Schedule K-1 using code AH.
Penalty Relief under Notice 2019-20
Partnerships that do not report negative tax basis capital accounts on their Schedule K-1’s will generally be subject to a penalty. However, the penalty may be waived for partnerships with taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 2017, but before Jan. 1, 2019, if the following two conditions are met:
1) Schedule K-1’s with all other required information are timely filed, including by extension, with the IRS and timely furnished to the partners
2) The partnership files a schedule with the IRS within 180 days after the six-month extended due date (even if the partnership does not file an extension), but not later than March 15, 2020. A schedule must be filed for each partner with a negative tax basis capital account and include the partner’s name, address, taxpayer identification number, and the amount of the partner’s tax basis capital account at the beginning and end of the tax year at issue.
The partnership is not required to furnish amended Schedule K-1’s to its partners or file an administrative adjustment request under Section 6227. Additional information concerning this penalty relief will be posted on the IRS website in the coming weeks.
Related Services
Any advice contained in this communication, including attachments and enclosures, is not intended as a thorough, in-depth analysis of specific issues. Nor is it sufficient to avoid tax-related penalties. This has been prepared for information purposes and general guidance only and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice specific to, among other things, your individual facts, circumstances and jurisdiction. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and CohnReznick LLP, its partners, employees and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it.
-
InsightConnecticut taking applications for essential worker premium payCindy Galamgam, Marissa McClainCertain individuals who worked during the COVID-19 pandemic may be eligible for up to $1,000. Read more and apply by October 1.
-
InsightWhat would the Inflation Reduction Act mean for carried interest taxation?Robert Richardt, Moshe BidermanThe proposed legislation would adjust holding periods, transfer rules, and other aspects of taxation of carried interest. Read more.
-
InsightN.Y. case: Vacation home not a permanent place of abodeLance Rothenberg, Corey L. RosenthalThe recent decision around a taxpayer’s statutory residency may open the door for others to argue the same, under similar facts.
-
InsightNew California budget offers tax relief: Refunds, credits, and moreTed Tourian, Marietta Probst, Krista SchippRead about key refunds, credits, grants, and other tax provisions in California’s latest budget, including changes to cannabis taxation.
-
InsightRetaining LIHTC leadership – Why succession planning mattersMatthew BarcelloHow does an organization “download” the depth of experience to the next generation of Low-Income Housing Tax Credit leaders? Read our recommendations.