New Jersey provides guidance on its unitary business test and combined reporting requirement
The New Jersey Division of Taxation has provided technical guidance (TB- 93) regarding its unitary business test. As previously discussed, for tax periods ending on or after July 31, 2019, New Jersey will require business entities that meet the unitary business test to be included in a combined income tax return.
Compared with other states, New Jersey has a much broader definition of what entities are included in the unitary business definition, i.e., passive holding companies.
Pursuant to the guidance, a unitary business is defined to mean “a single economic enterprise that is made up either of separate parts of a single business entity or of a group of business entities under common ownership that are sufficiently interdependent, integrated, and interrelated through their activities so as to provide a synergy and mutual benefit that produces a sharing or exchange of value among them and a significant flow of value among the separate parts". The unitary business definition “will be construed to the broadest extent permitted” under the U.S. Constitution.
A taxpayer that meets either the “Interdependence of Functions Test” or the “Unity of Operations and Use Tests” is part of the unitary business.
The presence of any of the following factors indicates an interdependence of function exists:
- Same line of business, e.g., wholesaling, retailing, and manufacturing.
- The entities’ primary activities comprise steps of a vertically structured business.
- Central management.
- Goods or services among entities are not provided at an arm’s-length price. (However, the mere existence of arm’s length pricing between entities does not indicate lack of unity.)
- Existence of benefits from joint, shared, or common activity.
- Relationship of joint, shared, or common activity to income-producing operations.
- Exercise of control by one entity over another.
Unity of operation is defined to mean that there is functional integration that is evidenced by shared support functions. Unity of use “is evidenced generally by centralized management or use of centralized policies.” The unities are present if each entity “benefits or receives goods, services, support, guidance, or direction arising from the actions of common staff resources or common executive resources, personnel, third-party providers,” etc.
Factors to be considered include:
- Common purchasing
- Common advertising
- Common employees, including sales force
- Common accounting or legal
- Common retirement plan
- Common insurance coverage
- Common marketing
- Common cash management or financing support
- Common research and development
- Common offices, manufacturing, warehousing, or transportation facilities
- Common computer systems and support
- Common management (i.e., one or more officers or directors of the parent are also officers or directors of the subsidiary)
- Control of major policies (e.g., the parent corporation’s board of directors requires that it approve any acquisition by either the parent or subsidiary of any interest in any other company; or the parent corporation’s board of directors requires that it approve any lending in excess of a minimum amount to any one or more of either the parent or subsidiary’s suppliers.)
- Inter-entity transactions
- Common policy or training manuals
- Required budgetary approval
- Required capital asset purchases approval
Any advice contained in this communication, including attachments and enclosures, is not intended as a thorough, in-depth analysis of specific issues. Nor is it sufficient to avoid tax-related penalties. This has been prepared for information purposes and general guidance only and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and CohnReznick LLP, its members, employees and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it.
InsightWayfair decision having an impact on consumer and retail M&A: Watch for unforeseen sales tax liabilitiesStephen Wyss, Harry Golematis, Scott Smith, Krista SchippThe holding changed the nexus rules for imposing sales tax on out-of-state businesses, which may impact direct-to-consumer businesses’ liabilities. Read more.
InsightWayfair in the context of mergers & acquisitions: Watch for unforeseen sales tax liabilitiesHarry Golematis, Scott Smith, Krista SchippThe new nexus standard requiring business to collect and remit sales tax in additional states also creates new risks for buyers of a business. Learn more.
InsightSALT workarounds: Treasury provides safe harbors in latest regulationsC corporations, pass-through entities, and itemizing taxpayers have options for payments made to charitable organizations under new tax regulations.
InsightMassachusetts issues proposed regulations for the Angel Investor Tax CreditKevin MichaelanRead what counts as a qualifying investor, investment, and business for the life sciences investment program, and prepare to apply quickly.
InsightCalifornia approves budget changes including NOL suspension, tax credit limitationsKrista Schipp, John OnCalifornia is suspending net operating losses (NOLs), limiting certain tax credits to $5 million, and taking other steps to help offset the impact of COVID-19.