Maryland passes new legislation for an elective pass-through entity tax
Maryland recently passed new legislation allowing pass-through entities (PTEs) such as partnerships and S corporations to make an election to be taxed at the entity level instead of being taxed at the owner level. This new elective tax could potentially allow for a federal tax deduction for owners who are capped at a $10,000-per-year state tax deduction under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA).
The new Maryland legislation creates an elective entity-level tax for Maryland PTEs. The tax rate will be the top marginal Maryland tax rate for individuals (5.75%) plus the lowest applicable county tax rate (2.25%), or the Maryland corporate tax rate (8.25%). PTE owners must still report their business income derived from the PTE on their individual federal and Maryland tax returns, but they can claim a credit against Maryland state income tax equal to the tax paid by the PTE. Taxes due under this new regime can’t exceed the distributable cash flow of the PTE. Further, it is important to note that if the PTE makes this election but doesn’t pay the tax, Maryland can collect the taxes due from the owners.
Under the new legislation, distributable income to tax-exempt owners and real estate investment trust (REIT) owners will not be taxed. Owners that are themselves PTEs will not have the option to have their income taxed at the lower level. Instead, the upper-tier PTE must make an independent election to have income taxed at the entity level.
Currently, there are several questions that have yet to be addressed by the Comptroller of Maryland. These questions include but are not limited to: 1) whether the election will carry over when a PTE interest is sold; 2) whether PTEs must make the election on annual basis or the election will be permanent; and 3) how and when a PTE will need to make the election.
Any advice contained in this communication, including attachments and enclosures, is not intended as a thorough, in-depth analysis of specific issues. Nor is it sufficient to avoid tax-related penalties. This has been prepared for information purposes and general guidance only and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice specific to, among other things, your individual facts, circumstances and jurisdiction. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and CohnReznick LLP, its partners, employees and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it.
InsightNew York City’s Commercial Rent Tax (CRT): A refresherCorey L. Rosenthal, Jamie Kelly, Leon YaoLearn who is subject to the tax; how its regular and small business tax credits work; who is exempt in two specified zones; and more.
InsightNew Jersey tax legislation adopts federal partnership audit regime, eliminates state S-ElectionHarry GolematisThe new state tax legislation, passed in late December 2022, also ended certain COVID-related suspensions. Read more.
InsightCannabis SALT Shaker: State and local developments in tax and more (Q4 2022)Krista Schipp, Cassandra Baubie, Jamie KellyRead about developments and trends in cannabis legalization, licensing, CBD taxation, and more. States featured: NY, IL
InsightFlorida court reaffirms the state’s cost-of-performance sourcing for the sale of servicesJohn Iannotti, James GaulA new ruling in Florida’s court has essentially reverted legislation concerning the state’s cost-of-performance sourcing for the sale of services back to the original language of the regulation. Read more.