IRS releases Rev. Proc. 2020-25: Adjustments to QIP depreciation
The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act included a notable correction to the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA): Qualified Improvement Property (QIP) is now classified as a 15-year property, making it eligible for 100% bonus depreciation through 2022.
On April 17, 2020, the IRS published Revenue Procedure 2020-25, which provides procedural guidance allowing taxpayers to change depreciation for certain QIP or to make or revoke or withdraw certain elections.
The TCJA established the “Qualified Improvement Property” classification, replacing the three previous classifications for non-residential improvements: Qualified Leasehold Improvements, Qualified Restaurant Property, and Qualified Retail Improvement Property.
QIP was meant to be 15-year property eligible for bonus depreciation, but an error in the statute gave it a 39-year depreciable life, making it ineligible.
The CARES Act corrected that error so that QIP is now 15-year property and eligible for 100% bonus depreciation through 2022. The change is effective for tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2017.
QIP is defined as “any improvement made by the taxpayer to an interior portion of a building which is nonresidential real property if such improvement is placed in service after the date such building was first placed in service.” It excludes costs for elevators, escalators, structural framework, or building expansions. The CARES act added the words “made by the taxpayer” to the definition.
Revenue Procedure 2020-25 provides procedural guidance allowing taxpayers to change depreciation under Section 168 for QIP placed in service after Dec. 31, 2017, in its taxable year ending in 2018, 2019, or 2020. Additionally, for the 2018, 2019, or 2020 tax years, this revenue procedure allows a taxpayer to make a late election, or to revoke or withdraw an election, under the following sections:
- Section 168(g)(7) [use of the alternative depreciation system (ADS)]
- Section 168(k)(7) [election out of bonus depreciation]
NOTE: Rev. Proc. 2020-25 does not apply to:
- Taxpayers that made a late election, or withdrew an election under Section 163(j)(7)(B) (electing real property trade or business) or Section 163(j)(7)(C) (electing farming business) in accordance with Revenue Procedure 2020-22. Any QIP depreciation adjustments for the year of the late election or withdrawal under Section 163(j)(7)(B) or (C) are made pursuant to Revenue Procedure 2020-22 on an amended tax return or Administrative Adjustment Request (AAR).
- QIP for which the taxpayer deducted or deducts the costs or other basis as an expense (e.g., by application of the tangible property regulations).
Specific procedures
In order to change depreciation under Section 168 for QIP and/or to make a late election or revoke an election under Section 168(g)(7) or (k)(7) per the above, generally taxpayers may do the following:
1. File an amended tax return;
2. File Form 3115, “Application for Change in Accounting Method”; or
3. File an AAR (in the case of a BBA partnership).
Note that the withdrawal of an election under Section 168(g)(7) may only be done by filing an amended return or AAR, not by filing a Form 3115.
Filing Form 3115
This revenue procedure modifies Revenue Procedure 2019-43 by adding two new automatic method changes:
1. The designated change number (DCN) 244 covers the changes in depreciation of QIP placed in service after Dec. 31, 2017.
2. The DCN 245 covers the changes associated with making a late election out of bonus depreciation, revoking an “election out” of bonus depreciation and/or a late election to use ADS.
Under these new sections, Form 3115 has reduced filing requirements, and certain eligibility rules are temporarily inapplicable. See Revenue Procedure 2020-25 for more information on the exact Form 3115 requirements.
Patrick Duffany, JD, CPA, Managing Partner, Tax
959.200.7270
Brian Newman, CPA, Partner, Practice Leader, Federal Tax Services
959.200.7009
Richard Shevak, JD, Principal, National Tax
862.245.5029
Travis Butler, Director, National Tax
312.508.5821
Derek Weaver, Senior Manager, National Tax
301.280.2727
Timothy McMillan, CPA, Manager, National Tax
973.364.7706
Related Services
Any advice contained in this communication, including attachments and enclosures, is not intended as a thorough, in-depth analysis of specific issues. Nor is it sufficient to avoid tax-related penalties. This has been prepared for information purposes and general guidance only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice specific to, among other things, your individual facts, circumstances and jurisdiction. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and CohnReznick LLP, its partners, employees and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it.
Coronavirus Resource Center
-
InsightFiscal Responsibility Act addresses debt ceiling, adjusts allocations, IRS fundingShayne ByrneThe Fiscal Responsibility Act will cap some spending over the next two years and rescind some of the $80 billion in IRS funding provided by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. Learn more.
-
InsightNew IRC Section 174 can affect all taxpayersTravis Butler, Scott Ibbotson, Tim MorrisonThe new Section 174 law has far-reaching implications for companies conducting qualified research and/or have experimental expenditures. Read more.
-
InsightRethinking tax accounting methods: 4 key change typesRichard Shevak, Travis Butler, Tim MorrisonOptimizing your company’s tax accounting methods can help you avoid IRS risk or defer tax payments. Read about 4 top change types and their benefits.
-
InsightBefore you file an estate tax return, here’s what to consider to maximize proceedsDonald NimeyIn some cases where assets’ value declines after the date of death, it may be possible to maximize proceeds with an alternative date. Learn more.