Connecticut Imposes Convenience of the Employer Test
For taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2019, compensation derived from Connecticut sources by a nonresident includes income from days worked outside the state for the employee’s convenience, but only if the nonresident’s state of domicile imposes a convenience of the employer test.
Convenience of the Employer Test
Pursuant to the convenience of the employer test, compensation earned by a nonresident employee is allocated to the location of the assigned or primary office of the employee, unless the work the nonresident performs is work which, of necessity, and not convenience, obligates the employee to work from a location other than the assigned or primary office.
If an employee’s state of residence uses a convenience of the employer test when determining the source of income of a nonresident, and the employee works for a Connecticut employer from a location in another state for the employee's own convenience, then the employer must include those days as days worked in Connecticut for purposes of determining the Connecticut source compensation of the employee for wage withholding and personal income tax purposes. There are currently four states that impose the convenience of the employer test: Delaware, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania.
Nonresidents and part-year residents of Connecticut who perform services for their employers at locations that are not their primary work places, along with their tax preparers, should take the convenience of the employer test into account in determining the Connecticut source income of nonresidents and part-year residents.
What Does CohnReznick Think?
It is important to be aware of the change to Connecticut compensation sourcing rules and how it may impact you, since the proper allocation of income to Connecticut may change for 2019 and subsequent years because of the convenience of the employer test.
For more information, please contact:
Matt Nick, Director, State and Local Tax Services
Cindy Galamgam, Senior Manager, State and Local Tax Services
Any advice contained in this communication, including attachments and enclosures, is not intended as a thorough, in-depth analysis of specific issues. Nor is it sufficient to avoid tax-related penalties. This has been prepared for information purposes and general guidance only and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and CohnReznick LLP, its members, employees and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it.
InsightDC 2020 Budget Support Legislation Brings Significant Tax ChangesDC Mayor Muriel Bowser signed the Fiscal Year 2020 Budget Support Act of 2019.
On-demandHow Renewables Can Get Into The Zones – The Opportunity ZoneJoel Cohn, Britta Von Oesen, John MarcianoPotentially one of the most beneficial tax incentives in decades, Opportunity Zones might be a boon to the rapidly changing renewable energy industry, particularly given looming ITC and PTC step-downs. However, complex IRS requirements, a tight investment deadline (12/31/19), and a long vesting period (7-10 years) to reap maximum tax benefits make it especially challenging for investors and developers to leverage this opportunity.
InsightCalifornia AB91 Closes Loophole, Provides Tax Breaks for Small Businesses, FamiliesHee Jo Chun, John OnOn July 2, 2019, California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill 91 (AB91), which conforms to several provisions in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) passed by Congress in 2017. This bill improves the state’s long-term financial stability by closing a series of loopholes and providing tax breaks to small businesses.
InsightNY, NJ, and CT Sue IRS for Disallowing SALT Deduction Cap WorkaroundCorey Rosenthal, Lance RothenbergNew York, New Jersey, and Connecticut filed a joint lawsuit against the IRS on July 17, 2019, setting up the next chapter and newest battlefront in the dispute between certain states and the federal government in response to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act’s $10,000 cap on the state and local tax (SALT) deduction.
InsightCapitol Connection: The Budget Deal Paves the Way to Tax LegislationBob MossWHAT HAPPENED? Last week, the White House and Congress reached a budget deal that doesn't appear to include any tax measures, raising questions for us about what the next vehicle might be for matters like extenders and technical corrections to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. That outcome leaves a range of advocates, including supporters of both the Affordable Housing Credit Improvement Act (AHCIA) and the New Markets Tax Credit (NMTC), looking for ways to get their priorities into law.