GOVERNMENT: Capitalize on the DATA Act to track COVID-19 spending
In May 2014, President Obama signed the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act (DATA Act) into law. The DATA Act requires government agencies to publish procurement and financial assistance spending at the transaction level on USAspending.gov.
Prior to the DATA Act, agencies had published some spending information, but it had not been linked to official financial system records. The DATA Act also standardized the way reporting should occur across 57 data elements.
Today, the federal government faces a new and related data challenge. Since early March, President Trump has signed three COVID-19 relief packages into law, with well over $2 trillion in new spending associated with the third, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. The foundation of transparency established through the DATA Act provides a great mechanism for stakeholders and the public to monitor the influx of new spending spurred by COVID-19.
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) is already looking for ways to amend DATA Act submissions to ensure COVID-19 spending is reported transparently. We support this effort and present several great opportunities below for using the existing DATA Act infrastructure for COVID-19 transparency.
1. Program activity: USAspending.gov groups common spending across categories together, and users can further dig into the data to see how similar categories of spending are used in different agencies.
2. Location data: USAspending.gov allows users to search for government awards down to the level of zip code. Users will be able to see which states and local communities receive the most COVID-19 funding, as represented by the businesses and entities receiving awards.
3. Congressional district: If the right codes are used when preparing the data, users would be able to see which Congressional districts benefited the most from the emergency spending.
4. Amounts yet to be obligated: Government spending data is granular enough to let people see the velocity of spending. If money is being held up, users will see a difference between the dollars available and those that have been obligated.
5. Cross-agency comparisons: USAspending.gov data allows easy comparisons between government agencies. Users can determine if certain agencies are exemplars in releasing CARES spending, and those exemplars can drive better practices at other agencies.
6. Daily updates: USAspending.gov is updated with new procurement spending daily, and new financial assistance (e.g., grants and loans) must be uploaded within 30 days. Accordingly, the public will have very quick indicators in place for how well agencies are using public money.
The six benefits listed above are an enormous step forward for the transparency of government spending. However, the DATA Act infrastructure isn’t turnkey for the COVID-19 challenge. Quick changes need to be made to the way agencies report data to ensure the maximum benefit to users. DATA Act implementation has been an immense effort that took years of careful planning to achieve high levels of accuracy and overall quality. Changing quickly has drawbacks (e.g., the risk of some bad data entering the public sphere). However, the benefits outweigh those drawbacks, and bad data can easily be replaced when it is identified.
The goal with transparency should not be to get it perfect every time, but rather to make the available data “perfect enough” for understanding the state of important government functions and interventions. The current emergency calls for quick changes and quickly fixing issues with the data if and when they arise. With expedient action to modify USAspending.gov, the public will be able to follow along and understand how their money is being spent.
With the large increase in government spending, it is not an option to make no changes. The government must let citizens see the efficiency and completeness of spending information. A huge boost in usefulness would also arise from linking spending with outcome and performance data. The data available on USAspending.gov cannot meet this need currently. However, when innovative statisticians and data scientists have access to transparent information, they will likely be able to link the spending to outcomes in innovative ways. The time is now to make this spending transparent and begin writing the next chapter in open government.
This article was produced in collaboration between CohnReznick and The Center for Organizational Excellence, Inc.
Bill Hughes, Partner, Federal Market Leader, CohnReznick
703.744.6750
Paul Eder, Lead Consultant, The Center for Organizational Excellence, Inc.
443.637.2850
Steve Goodrich, President and CEO, The Center for Organizational Excellence, Inc.
240.361.9230
Related Services
Coronavirus Resource Center
-
InsightFraud prevention techniques for infrastructure programsAn increase in infrastructure spending introduces a higher likelihood of fraud. In this article, CohnReznick’s infrastructure professionals provide advice on how to mitigate fraud in infrastructure projects. Learn more.
-
InsightTips for administering a successful small business grant programTavares Williams, Logan Hurley, Maria Ramirez, Joey GalloExplore our team’s top advice for executing successful grant programs, on KPIs, record-keeping, customer service, and more.
-
InsightMonitoring programs: A first defense against infrastructure grant fraudRoman CastilloState and local agencies must develop thorough assessments, processes, and policies to protect their IIJA, ARPA, and IRA funding. Read more.
-
InsightGovernment Impact: Q1 2023An update on CohnReznick's collaboration with federal, state, and local governments.