CPA, Partner
View full biography
Assessing business systems applicability: A serious business
Contrary to popular belief, business systems are not specific software packages. Instead, they are a confluence of policies, procedures, and reestablished practices.
Business systems are the foundation of any sustainable and profitable company. In the federal contracting realm, they are as follows: accounting, estimating, material management, purchasing, earned value management, and property. These systems flow into the financial statements. So, if you do not have efficient or properly functioning internal controls in place within these systems, you may be in for a real eye-opener if you receive a notification of an impending business-system audit.
Many U.S. government contractors are expected to comply with contractual requirements for maintaining adequate business systems. Business-systems rules and requirements are not limited to those who primarily serve the Department of Defense. The criteria typically used to determine the adequacy of business systems can be found throughout Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), and other agency supplements. Industry and federal contracting officers consider the criteria within these regulations as suitable standards to use in determining the acceptability of any government contractor’s internal controls. How well-versed are you in these requirements?
Business systems are the foundation of any sustainable and profitable company. In the federal contracting realm, they are as follows: accounting, estimating, material management, purchasing, earned value management, and property. These systems flow into the financial statements. So, if you do not have efficient or properly functioning internal controls in place within these systems, you may be in for a real eye-opener if you receive a notification of an impending business-system audit.
Many U.S. government contractors are expected to comply with contractual requirements for maintaining adequate business systems. Business-systems rules and requirements are not limited to those who primarily serve the Department of Defense. The criteria typically used to determine the adequacy of business systems can be found throughout Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), and other agency supplements. Industry and federal contracting officers consider the criteria within these regulations as suitable standards to use in determining the acceptability of any government contractor’s internal controls. How well-versed are you in these requirements?
Business systems applicability chart
CohnReznick’s Government Contracting Industry practice has developed a tool to help federal contractors easily determine when and which business systems may be subject to assessment by federal contracting officers and/or auditors. Scan through the listed criteria to see if your systems may be coming up for federal scrutiny.
Download
For those working on Department of Defense contracts, a non-compliant business system may hurt your wallet. DFARS 252.242-7005 (e) indicates that if a contracting officer determines that any of a contractor’s required business systems has significant deficiencies, they will withhold five percent on progress payments until the deficiencies have been corrected. While the fixes may be simple to implement, the follow-on audit to verify the corrections may take months or longer. To avoid these withholdings and maintain a competitive advantage, contractors must understand which business systems would currently or soon be subject to an audit.
Related services
For over 40 years, CohnReznick has provided comprehensive services to assist government contractors with a full life cycle approach to winning and managing contracts. We ensure your financial and procurement processes are compliant, efficient and effective - so you can focus on what matters most, profitable growth.
This has been prepared for information purposes and general guidance only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and CohnReznick LLP, its members, employees and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it.
2019 GAUGE Report: Industry Roadmap of Benchmarks & Trends for GovCon
Learn more
Access Our Government Contracting Topic Page for Key Insights & Powerful Tools
Explore insight collection
Related Insights
-
InsightContribute to the 2021 GAUGE surveyCohnReznick and Unanet invite you to take part in our fifth annual benchmarking survey for government contractors and other organizations that do business with the federal government.
-
InsightBusiness of Construction – February 2021CohnReznick will be featuring several topics important to the construction industry in a series of listen-in-style conversations, webinars, best-practice insights, and other helpful tools.
-
InsightStart preparing now to earn points on GSA’s Polaris contract opportunityJeff Shapiro, Bhavesh VadhaniLearn what self-assessments, certifications, and other potential requirements to consider now for this upcoming IT services government contracting opportunity.
-
InsightGOVERNMENT CONTRACTING: DCAA issues guidance on coronavirus-related legislationJeff Shapiro, Caitlin LewisRead considerations for incurred cost audits and forward pricing audits potentially impacted by the CARES Act, the FFCRA, and more.
-
InsightHome office expenses: Tax and FAR implications for government contractorsJeff Shapiro, Dana Fried, Chase ClarkLearn what costs related to helping government contracting employees work from home may be allowable, deductible, and non-taxable amid COVID-19.