Background

In late 2018, the California legislature responded to South Dakota v. Wayfair (June 21, 2018), by enacting an economic nexus provision. The new rules, which were effective April 1, 2019, required retailers to collect and remit California use tax if, in the prior or current calendar year, their sales into the state exceeded $100,000, or if they made sales into the state in at least 200 separate transactions. The enactment of AB 147 increases the sales amount threshold to $500,000 and eliminates the 200 transactions threshold altogether. Notably, the California legislature declined to impose a retroactive registration and collection requirement on remote sellers; the economic nexus provisions are effective April 1, 2019.

Prior to the enactment of AB 147, retailers that were registered or required to be registered with the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) had to collect and remit district use tax beginning on April 1, 2019, if their sales into the district during the preceding or current calendar year exceeded the economic nexus thresholds. However, the enactment of AB 147 now ties a retailer’s district use tax collection obligations to the state economic nexus threshold, effective April 1, 2019.Notably, for transactions occurring on or after April 1, 2019, a retailer with economic nexus in the state must also collect any applicable district taxes on all sales into the state independent of the retailer’s sales volume at the district level.

Prior to the enactment of AB 147, California did not have provisions on its books related to sales facilitated by marketplace facilitators.

Economic nexus threshold is $500,000 in sales for delivery in California

Effective April 1, 2019, a retailer engages in business in California if, in the current or prior calendar year, the retailer has total combined sales of tangible personal property for delivery in the state by it, and all persons related to it under IRC Section 267(b) and its regulations, exceeding $500,000. Relief may be available to certain retailers engaged in business in California for interest or penalties imposed on use tax liabilities for tax reporting periods beginning April 1, 2019, through Dec. 31, 2022.

By revising the applicable economic nexus thresholds, California has granted relief to small businesses making sales in California not exceeding $500,000. Being relieved of such collection, remittance, and compliance obligations helps small businesses retain more capital, thereby supporting reinvestments into their own businesses, which allows them to remain competitive against larger businesses with greater resources. Remote sellers having no more than $500,000 in California sales in the current or prior calendar year may now make an unlimited number of sales into the state without triggering a collection obligation.

AB 147 also ties collection and remittance obligations for purposes of district use taxes to the revised state economic nexus provisions. Specifically, a retailer is deemed to engage in business in a district if in the preceding calendar year or the current calendar year, the retailer’s total combined sales of tangible personal property in the state or for delivery in the state by it and all persons related to it exceed $500,000. Thus, any retailer meeting the California economic nexus threshold must also collect and remit district use taxes.

Impact

Effective April 1, 2019, remote sellers must register with the CDTFA and collect California use tax if, in the current or prior calendar year, the retailer has total combined sales of tangible personal property for delivery in the state by it, and all persons related to it under IRC Section 267(b) and its regulations, exceeding $500,000. Further, sellers meeting the $500,000 economic nexus threshold in the state must also collect any applicable district use tax, independent of whether the economic nexus threshold is met in a particular district, which relieves taxpayers of the onerous task of tracking its economic activity at the district level for purposes of a separate, district-level economic nexus threshold.

Marketplace facilitators

Beginning Oct. 1, 2019, a marketplace facilitator will be considered the seller and retailer for each sale facilitated through its marketplace for purposes of determining whether it must register with the CDTFA. Further, in determining whether a marketplace facilitator has met the $500,000 sales volume threshold for purposes of economic nexus in California, it will need to include (1) all sales made on its own behalf, (2) sales by all related persons, and (3) sales facilitated on behalf of marketplace sellers. The provisions enacted under AB 147 deem any registered marketplace facilitator that facilitates a retail sale by a marketplace seller the retailer of that sale for purposes of collecting and remitting the sales and use tax.

A marketplace facilitator for these purposes is “a person who contracts with marketplace sellers to facilitate for consideration, regardless of whether deducted as fees from the transaction, the sale of the marketplace seller's products through a marketplace operated by the person or a related person and who” (1) directly or indirectly, through one or more related persons (a) transmits or otherwise communicates the offer or acceptance between the buyer and seller; (b) owns or operates the infrastructure, electronic or physical, or technology that brings buyers and sellers together; (c) provides a virtual currency that buyers are allowed or required to use to purchase products from the seller; or (d) engages in software development or research and development activities related to payment processing services, fulfillment or storage services, listing products for sale, setting prices, branding sales as those of the marketplace facilitator, order taking, or providing customer service or accepting or assisting with returns or exchanges; and (2) directly or indirectly, through one or more related persons, engages in payment processing services, fulfillment or storage services, listing products for sale, setting prices, branding sales as those of the marketplace facilitator, order taking, or providing customer service or accepting or assisting with returns or exchanges, with respect to the marketplace seller’s products.

Impact

Beginning Oct. 1, 2019, registered marketplace facilitators in California that facilitate a retail sale by a marketplace seller must collect and remit sales or use tax on behalf of those marketplace sellers, with limited exceptions. Although marketplace sellers must include all sales into California, including those facilitated through any marketplace facilitator’s marketplace, for purposes of determining whether it has economic nexus in the state, the marketplace seller need only collect and remit tax on its sales not facilitated through a registered marketplace facilitator.

What does CohnReznick think?

This is a dynamic area of state and local tax; we will continue to monitor these and other Wayfair-related developments and their impact upon taxpayers making sales across jurisdictions. Taxpayers making sales into California should take steps to familiarize themselves with the revised economic nexus provisions and the new marketplace facilitator provisions to ensure proper compliance.

Contact

_{Any advice contained in this communication, including attachments and enclosures, is not intended as a thorough, in-depth analysis of specific issues. Nor is it sufficient to avoid tax-related penalties. This has been prepared for information purposes and general guidance only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice specific to, among other things, your individual facts, circumstances and jurisdiction. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and CohnReznick LLP, its partners, employees and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it.}